Compare › P2S vs X1C

P2S vs X1C

$650 price gap, here's what you actually get for the money

Which one should I buy?

Get the P2S ($549) if you're a hobbyist or even a serious maker. Get the X1C ($1199) only if you specifically need Lidar-assisted first-layer calibration and AI failure detection.

P2S

  • $650 cheaper, that's a lot of filament or upgrades
  • 600mm/s vs 500mm/s, actually faster than the X1C
  • AMS 2.0, more reliable than the original AMS in X1C
  • Newer platform with forward-looking software support

X1C

  • Lidar, scans first layers in real time for perfect adhesion
  • AI spaghetti detection, stops prints automatically on failure
  • Micro Lidar for flow calibration, more consistent extrusion
  • Full AMS included in base price
  • Established platform with large community and accessory ecosystem

Specs at a glance

FeatureP2SX1C
Price$549$1,199
Build volume256 × 256 × 256 mm256 × 256 × 256 mm
Max speed600 mm/s500 mm/s
KinematicsCoreXYCoreXY
EnclosureYesYes
Chamber tempPassive ~50°CPassive ~45°C
Max nozzle temp300°C300°C
AMS typeAMS 2.0Full AMS
LidarNoYes
AI failure detectionNoYes

What does $650 actually buy you?

The core print quality of both machines at normal speeds is nearly identical. Both are enclosed CoreXY printers with 256mm³ build volume. The X1C's premium pays for Lidar and AI systems that reduce manual intervention, useful if you run prints unattended for hours and can't afford failures.

Ironically, the P2S is faster (600mm/s vs 500mm/s) because it's a newer platform. The X1C's Lidar does improve first-layer calibration meaningfully, but you can achieve excellent first layers on the P2S with proper bed prep.

Get the P2S if...

  • You're a hobbyist or enthusiast, even a serious one
  • You're present during prints and can catch failures yourself
  • You want to save $650 for filament, tools, or other upgrades
  • You want the faster machine (600mm/s)

Get the X1C if...

  • You run long unattended prints and failures are costly
  • You need Lidar first-layer verification for consistency
  • You run a small print farm and need reliability automation
  • Budget is not a significant constraint

For hobbyists: no. Lidar is convenient, not transformative. You can get perfect first layers on the P2S with good bed prep and a small amount of experience. For production or farm use where you leave printers running overnight and failures cost real money, Lidar starts to justify itself. Honest answer: most people asking this question should buy the P2S.

More comparisons