Quick answer: Get the A2L ($469) if you print PLA/PETG and want a much bigger bed plus the optional cutting plotter. Get the P2S ($549) only if you need an enclosure for ABS or ASA; the $80 gap isn't the point, the enclosure is.

Which one should I buy?

Get the A2L ($469) if you print PLA and PETG, want a much bigger bed, and like the optional cutting plotter. Get the P2S ($549) if you need an enclosure for ABS or ASA. They target different jobs: the A2L is a large open-frame machine, the P2S is a smaller enclosed CoreXY for engineering-ish materials. The $80 gap isn't the point, the enclosure is.

A2L

  • Much bigger bed: 330 × 320 × 325 mm vs 256 × 256 × 256 mm
  • Optional Cutting Upgrade Kit (~$60): vinyl/sticker/paper plotter with pen module
  • $80 cheaper ($469 vs $549)
  • Open frame: easy loading and monitoring for PLA/PETG/TPU
  • AMS lite chains up to 19 colors

P2S

  • Enclosed: handles ABS, ASA and other warp-prone materials
  • CoreXY kinematics, better for tall and heavy prints at speed
  • Faster: 600 mm/s vs 500 mm/s
  • Hardened-steel nozzle and 110°C bed for engineering-ish work
  • Full AMS 2.0 with HEPA + carbon filtration

Specs at a glance

FeatureA2LP2S
Price$469$549
Build volume330 × 320 × 325 mm256 × 256 × 256 mm
Max speed500 mm/s600 mm/s
KinematicsBed-slingerCoreXY
EnclosureNo (open frame)Yes
ChamberOpenEnclosed, not actively heated
Max nozzle temp300°C300°C
Max bed temp80°C110°C
NozzleDirect drive + filament cutterHardened steel
AMS systemAMS lite (19 colors)AMS 2.0 (16 colors)
Cutting plotter kitOptional (~$60)No
HEPA + carbon filterNoYes
LidarNoNo
ReleasedJun 2026Oct 2025

A small price gap, two different machines

At $80 apart, it's tempting to treat the A2L and P2S as rivals, but they barely overlap. The A2L is a large open-frame bed-slinger built for high-volume PLA, PETG and TPU. The P2S is a smaller enclosed CoreXY built to add ABS, ASA and warp-prone materials to your options. The deciding question isn't price, it's whether you need an enclosure.

If you ever want to print ABS or ASA, even occasionally, the A2L will frustrate you: there is no enclosure and no heated chamber, so the bed tops out at 80°C and large parts warp and crack on the open frame. The P2S enclosure traps ambient heat and solves this. If you only print PLA and PETG, the enclosure buys you nothing and the A2L's much bigger bed and lower price win.

Where each one pulls ahead

The A2L's headline advantages are size and the cutting plotter. Its 330 × 320 × 325 mm bed dwarfs the P2S's 256 mm cube, and the optional ~$60 Cutting Upgrade Kit turns it into a Cricut-style vinyl and sticker cutter, something no enclosed Bambu can do. For makers and craft businesses printing large PLA/PETG parts, that combination is hard to beat at $469.

The P2S wins on materials and motion. Its enclosure, hardened-steel nozzle and 110°C bed handle ABS and ASA reliably, its CoreXY design is steadier for tall prints, and it's faster at 600 mm/s. Add HEPA + carbon filtration and full AMS 2.0, and it's the better pick the moment engineering materials enter the picture.

Get the A2L if...

  • You mostly print PLA, PETG, or TPU
  • You want the largest bed for the money
  • You want the optional vinyl/sticker cutting plotter
  • You don't need an enclosure and want to save $80

Get the P2S if...

  • You want to print ABS, ASA, or other warp-prone materials
  • You want an enclosure with HEPA + carbon filtration
  • You want CoreXY stability and 600 mm/s speed
  • 256 mm is enough build volume for your prints

Not reliably, and it isn't designed for it. The A2L has no heated chamber and its bed caps at 80°C, so even with a DIY enclosure you'd be fighting warping and poor layer adhesion on ABS and ASA, especially at its large bed size. If ABS/ASA is a real requirement, buy the enclosed P2S rather than trying to convert an open-frame machine. Keep the A2L for what it does best: large PLA, PETG and TPU prints, plus the cutting-plotter option.

More comparisons